Corperate News

FG to seek compensation for Nigerians forced to abandon businesses in South Africa    Power outages, poor internet top obstacles facing Nigerian creatives    Enugu's annual inflation rate up at 20.4%, from 17.0% in April 2026.    Forex    US Dollar/Naira: N1,300    British Pounds/Naira: N2,151      Euro/Naira: N1,816

Sunday, 16 August 2026

Omotola Jalade Opens Up on What Actors Earn After Movies Make Millions


Omotola Jalade Opens Up on What Actors Earn After Movies Make Millions


Veteran Nollywood actress Omotola Jalade-Ekeinde has sparked renewed discussion about how much Nigerian actors actually take home from successful movie projects.

The actress, who has enjoyed one of the longest and most successful careers in Nollywood, has previously spoken about the economics of the Nigerian film industry and the difference between a film’s commercial success and an individual actor’s remuneration.

A movie generating millions of naira at the box office does not necessarily mean that the actors involved receive a corresponding share of the revenue. Depending on the project, an actor's contract may involve a fixed appearance fee, negotiated percentages, or other arrangements agreed with the producer.

This distinction is particularly important as Nigeria's cinema industry has experienced a significant increase in blockbuster releases and record-breaking box-office figures.



Omotola's comments provide an opportunity to examine a question that has long interested Nollywood audiences: when a film becomes a major commercial success, who actually gets the money?

For actors, producers, distributors and cinema operators, revenue can be divided according to contractual agreements and distribution arrangements. Consequently, the amount reported as a movie's gross earnings should not automatically be interpreted as the amount paid to its stars.

Omotola, one of Nollywood's most recognisable actresses, has appeared in numerous commercially successful productions and remains an influential voice on the industry's development.


Nigeria’s Insurance Future Hangs in Balance as Reform Battle Goes to Court

 The Recapitalization Battle That Could Redefine the Insurance Industry, Nigeria Must Get the Reform Balance Right

Nigeria’s insurance industry is standing at a critical crossroads. A reform designed to create stronger, more competitive insurance companies has now entered a legal battlefield, with two major industry institutions   Nigeria Reinsurance Corporation (Nigeria Reinsurance) and NICON Insurance challenging the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) over the ongoing recapitalization exercise.

The dispute is more than a disagreement over regulatory requirements. It represents a much bigger question about the future direction of Nigeria’s insurance sector:

How does a country modernise a fragile industry without destroying institutions that have played strategic roles in its financial history?

At the heart of the controversy is NAICOM’s decision to raise the capital requirements for insurance companies as part of efforts to strengthen the sector, improve claims-paying capacity and position Nigerian insurers for bigger economic responsibilities.

The regulator’s argument is straightforward: an insurance industry cannot support a modern economy with companies that lack the financial strength to absorb major risks.

But for Nigeria Reinsurance and NICON, the issue appears to be more complicated than meeting a new financial threshold. It touches on their unique identities, historical significance and roles within Nigeria’s insurance architecture.

The Need for Reform Is Undeniable

For decades, Nigeria’s insurance industry has struggled to match the size and potential of the country’s economy.

Despite being Africa’s largest economy, insurance penetration remains low. Many individuals and businesses continue to operate without adequate risk protection, while public confidence in insurance remains affected by concerns around delayed claims settlement and limited awareness.

The consequences are significant.

A weak insurance sector means businesses struggle to protect investments, banks face higher lending risks and the economy loses an important source of long-term capital. This is why NAICOM’s recapitalisation drive carries strategic importance.

- A well-capitalised insurance industry can:

- Support infrastructure projects;

- Provide confidence to investors;

- Underwrite large corporate risks;

- Improve claims settlement;

- Compete with global insurance markets.

Nigeria cannot build a trillion-dollar economy with a weak risk-management system.

But Reform Must Not Become Disruption

While the need for stronger capital is clear, the ongoing legal dispute raises legitimate concerns about whether a single approach can fit every player in the insurance ecosystem.

Insurance companies do not all perform the same function. A retail insurer selling life and general insurance products operates differently from a reinsurance institution that provides financial backing for other insurers.

Nigeria Reinsurance occupies a strategic position because reinsurance is the backbone of the insurance industry. When insurance companies take on large risks, reinsurers provide additional protection that prevents a single event from threatening the entire system.

This unique role requires careful consideration. A reform that strengthens the industry should not unintentionally weaken institutions that provide stability within that same industry.

History Versus New Reality

NICON Insurance represents another dimension of the debate. For decades, the company was one of Nigeria’s most recognized insurance brands and played a significant role in the development of the sector.

However, the modern insurance environment is different. Competition has increased, private sector operators have grown stronger and regulators are demanding higher standards.

The challenge is finding a balance between preserving institutional value and ensuring that every operator meets the standards required in today’s market.

NAICOM’s Tough Choice

For NAICOM, the recapitalisation exercise is also a test of regulatory credibility. The insurance industry has undergone previous reforms, but questions have often remained about enforcement and whether weak operators were allowed to survive.

A regulator that announces reforms but fails to implement them risks losing investor confidence.

NAICOM’s position reflects a belief that Nigeria’s insurance industry must move beyond the era of small, under capitalised companies that struggle to meet obligations. The commission’s message is clear: The future belongs to financially strong insurers capable of protecting Nigerians and supporting economic growth.

The Danger of Excessive Consolidation

However, regulators must also recognise the risks of forcing rapid consolidation. If smaller or specialised institutions disappear too quickly, the market could become dominated by a few large players, reducing competition and limiting consumer choice.

The objective should not simply be fewer insurance companies.The objective should be better insurance companies.

A successful reform should create operators that are financially stronger, technologically advanced, customer-focused and trusted by Nigerians.

The Bigger Picture

The court case involving Nigeria Re, NICON and NAICOM is likely to become an important moment in Nigeria’s financial reform journey.

It forces the country to confront a difficult question:

Should economic reforms focus only on numbers, or should they also consider institution

Nigeria needs an insurance industry that can compete globally, but it must achieve this through reforms that are fair, transparent and carefully implemented.

The success of recapitalisation will not be measured by how many companies meet a capital threshold.

It will be measured by whether Nigerians begin to trust insurance, whether businesses can confidently manage risks and whether the industry becomes a true engine of economic growth.

The battle over recapitalisation is therefore not just about capital.

It is about the future architecture of Nigeria’s financial system