Corperate News

FG to seek compensation for Nigerians forced to abandon businesses in South Africa    Power outages, poor internet top obstacles facing Nigerian creatives    Enugu's annual inflation rate up at 20.4%, from 17.0% in April 2026.    Forex    US Dollar/Naira: N1,300    British Pounds/Naira: N2,151      Euro/Naira: N1,816

Wednesday, 22 April 2026

Nigeria’s Bold strategic move to reclaim control over its maritime economy, Is it history trying to repeat itself under a new name?

  


By Chiamaka Nnadigwe


After nearly three decades without a national fleet, Nigeria is making a bold return to the global shipping stage, this time with powerful allies from the United Arab Emirates.

In a strategic move aimed at reclaiming control over its maritime economy, the Federal Government has secured partnerships with global port operators AD Ports Group and DP World to relaunch a national shipping line.

Comeback Decades in the Making

Nigeria has been without a national carrier since the collapse of the Nigerian National Shipping Line in 1995, a failure widely attributed to mismanagement, inefficiency, and mounting debt.

Since then, foreign shipping giants have dominated Nigeria’s maritime trade, controlling the movement of goods in and out of Africa’s largest economy. The absence of a national fleet has cost the country billions in lost freight earnings—estimated at around $9 billion annually. Businessday

Now, the government wants that money and control back.

Why the UAE Partnership Matters

The involvement of AD Ports Group and DP World is not accidental. Both companies are global heavyweights in port management, shipping logistics, and trade infrastructure, with growing footprints across Africa. Their role is expected to go beyond just funding.

They bring:

a. Technical expertise in fleet and port operations

b.   Access to global shipping networks.

c. Experience in modern logistics and trade systems

For Nigeria, this could mean building a shipping line that actually works unlike past attempts.

The Economic Stakes

According to Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Adegboyega Oyetola, the new national carrier is designed to:

a. Reduce reliance on foreign shipping lines

b. Retain maritime revenue within Nigeria

c. Create jobs and develop local expertise In simple terms, Nigeria wants to stop being just a destination for cargo, and start becoming a player in moving it.

This aligns with broader reforms in the maritime sector, including port modernisation and funding initiatives like the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund, aimed at empowering indigenous shipowners. [The Guardian Nigeria]

The timing of this move is critical. Global supply chains are shifting, and major shipping companies are increasingly investing in emerging markets like Nigeria. Recent deals such as long-term port investments in Lagos highlight the growing importance of Nigeria as a logistics hub in West Africa.

At the same time, inefficiencies in Nigerian ports continue to drive up the cost of imports and exports, making reforms in the sector urgent.

A functional national shipping line could help reduce these inefficiencies while strengthening Nigeria’s bargaining power in global trade.

Lessons from the Past

However, history casts a long shadow.

The downfall of the Nigerian National Shipping Line remains a cautionary tale. Despite once operating a fleet of dozens of vessels, the company failed to compete globally and became a drain on public resources. For this new venture to succeed, analysts say Nigeria must avoid:

a.  Political interference

b.  Poor corporate governance

c.  Lack of competitiveness

In short, this cannot be another government-run bureaucracy it must operate like a global business.

Hope or Hype?

On paper, the revival of a national shipping line is a game-changer. It promises jobs, revenue, and strategic control over trade routes. But the real test lies ahead.

Can Nigeria build a shipping powerhouse that competes globally?

Or will history repeat itself under a new name?

For now, one thing is clear: Nigeria is no longer content watching from the sidelines of global shipping, it wants back in the game.

 

 

“60% slipping into Poverty”: Atiku Abubakar Blasts Bola Ahmed Tinubu Over World Bank Report



Nigeria’s deepening economic crisis has ignited a fresh political firestorm, as former Vice President Atiku Abubakar launches a scathing attack on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu following a troubling report by the World Bank indicating that over 60% of Nigerians now live below the poverty line.

A Stark Reality: Poverty on the Rise

According to the World Bank’s latest findings, Nigeria’s poverty rate has climbed sharply from about 40% just a few years ago to over 60% today, representing roughly , 140 million Nigerians struggling to survive

The report paints a troubling picture: even as macroeconomic indicators show signs of stabilization, everyday Nigerians are experiencing worsening hardship, shrinking purchasing power, and rising living costs.

Atiku’s Criticism: “This Is Not Reform, It Is Regression”: Reacting to the report, Atiku did not hold back. He described the situation as “regression on a monumental scale,”arguing that the current economic hardship is not accidental but the direct result of flawed policy choices. A government that has lost touch with reality (The Guardian Nigeria)

According to him, key reforms introduced by the Tinubu administration particularly:

The removal of fuel subsidies

The devaluation of the naira

These policies were implemented abruptly and without adequate safeguards for citizens.

Atiku insists these policies have triggered: Soaring food prices,  Declining real incomes, Widespread business strain, millions out of work. In his words and millions of Nigerians are not feeling any “reform dividend”, only economic pain.

 The “Disconnect” Argument

A central theme of Atiku’s criticism is what he calls a disconnect between government claims and lived reality.

While the administration points to:

Improved fiscal indicators

Stabilizing inflation trends

Structural economic reforms

Atiku argues that these metrics mean little when the majority of citizens are slipping deeper into poverty.

He warns that any government presiding over such conditions while claiming success risks losing both moral authority and economic direction.

World Bank’s Paradox: Growth vs. Hardship: Interestingly, the World Bank itself acknowledges this contradiction.

Nigeria’s economy shows signs of resilience and potential growth, but inflation, high costs, and weak income growth continue to erode living standards, slowing poverty reduction.

In simple terms:

The economy may be improving on paper, but not in people’s pockets.

A Political and Economic Crossroads

Atiku is now calling for a shift toward:

Gradual, well-sequenced reforms, Stronger social protection systems, Policies focused on job creation and food security

He argues that reform should lift people out of poverty not push more into it.

Meanwhile, the Tinubu administration maintains that its reforms often described as bold and necessary are designed to stabilize Nigeria’s economy in the long term, even if they come with short-term pain.

 Final Thought: This clash highlights a deeper national dilemma: Can Nigeria endure economic “shock therapy” today for stability tomorrow, or is the cost already too high? With over 60% of citizens now below the poverty line, the debate is no longer just political it is existential.