Corperate News

FG to seek compensation for Nigerians forced to abandon businesses in South Africa    Power outages, poor internet top obstacles facing Nigerian creatives    Enugu's annual inflation rate up at 20.4%, from 17.0% in April 2026.    Forex    US Dollar/Naira: N1,300    British Pounds/Naira: N2,151      Euro/Naira: N1,816

Monday, 1 June 2026

The Price Band Problem: Why NGX's ±10% Cap Needs a Monitored and Phased approach more than Proper Farewell

 

By Engr Chiamaka Nnadigwe

For decades, the Nigerian stock market has operated with a daily price movement limit known as a "price band." Under the current rule of the Nigerian Exchange (NGX), most stocks cannot rise or fall by more than 10% in a single trading day.

The idea sounds sensible. It was designed to prevent panic selling, reduce excessive speculation, and give investors time to digest information before making decisions. However, as Nigeria's capital market matures and seeks greater efficiency, many market participants are beginning to question whether the ±10% cap has outlived its usefulness.

What Does the ±10% Price Band Mean?

Imagine a stock closes today at ₦100.

Under the current rule:

The highest price it can trade tomorrow is ₦110.

The lowest price it can trade tomorrow is ₦90.: Even if investors believe the company is suddenly worth ₦130 or only ₦70 because of major news, the market is not allowed to adjust immediately. Instead, the stock may spend several days hitting its upper or lower limit before reaching its true market value.

Why Was the Rule Introduced? Price bands were introduced to:

1. Prevent market crashes caused by panic.

2. Reduce manipulation by speculators.

3. Protect retail investors from sudden price shocks.

4. Promote orderly trading.

These goals were particularly important when the Nigerian market was smaller, less liquid, and less technologically advanced.

The Problem With Price Bands: While the intentions are noble, the reality is often different.

1. They Delay Price Discovery

A stock market's primary function is to determine the fair value of companies. When important information emerges such as a major acquisition, a profit warning, or a regulatory action the market should be able to adjust quickly. Price limits slow this process, Instead of reaching the correct price immediately, stocks may spend days climbing or falling in 10% increments. The result is a market that reacts slowly to new information.

2. They Can Increase Volatility: Ironically, rules designed to reduce volatility can sometimes create more of it. Investors rush to buy stocks approaching the upper limit or sell stocks nearing the lower limit because they know trading may become constrained. This behavior often amplifies price movements rather than calming them.

 3. Investors Get Trapped: When a stock is falling sharply and repeatedly hits its lower limit, sellers can become trapped. They may want to exit but cannot find buyers. Similarly, when positive news emerges, buyers may struggle to acquire shares because the stock remains locked at its upper limit. The market effectively becomes frozen.

4. Nigeria Appears Less Competitive: Many leading global exchanges have moved away from rigid daily price limits. Markets such as those in the United States, United Kingdom, and much of Europe rely on circuit breakers and temporary trading halts rather than strict daily caps. These mechanisms pause trading briefly during extreme moves but allow prices to find their natural level afterward.

As Nigeria seeks to attract more foreign capital, investors often prefer markets where prices can adjust efficiently.

What Should Replace the Price Band? The answer is not a completely unregulated market. Instead, NGX could gradually transition toward modern volatility management tools. Possible alternatives include:

a. Temporary trading halts during extreme moves.

b. Volatility interruption auctions.

c. Enhanced market surveillance.

d.  Stricter penalties for market manipulation.

e. Real-time disclosure requirements. These tools are widely used in developed markets and allow prices to adjust while maintaining order.

 A Gradual Exit Is Better Than an Abrupt One: Eliminating the ±10% cap overnight may create unnecessary disruption. A phased approach could work better:

a. Increase the band to ±15%.

b. Later expand it to ±20%.

c.  Eventually replace it with circuit breakers and volatility controls.

This would give investors, brokers, and regulators time to adapt.

The Bottom Line: The ±10% price band was created for a different era of the Nigerian stock market. While it once served a useful purpose, it increasingly acts as a speed bump that slows price discovery, reduces market efficiency, and occasionally traps investors. If Nigeria wants a deeper, more liquid, and globally competitive capital market, the time may be approaching for a carefully managed farewell to rigid daily price limits.

Markets function best when prices are allowed to reflect information quickly. The challenge for regulators is not preventing price movements but ensuring that those movements occur in a transparent, orderly, and fair environment.

 In simple layman's terms: Think of the stock market like a market where yam sellers and buyers negotiate prices. If news suddenly breaks that a farmer's entire harvest has failed, the price of yam may naturally jump by 30% because supply is scarce.

Now imagine the government says prices can only rise by 10% per day. The market cannot immediately reach the true price. Buyers and sellers spend several days adjusting to reality.

That is essentially what NGX's ±10% price band does to shares. It limits how much a stock can move in one day, even when new information suggests the price should move much more. Critics argue that this slows the market's ability to reflect reality, while supporters believe it protects investors from panic and excessive speculation.

Sunday, 31 May 2026

X Takes Action Against Stolen Content and Demonetizes a Large Gaming System Account

 Nikita Bier, X’s head of product, said on Friday that X demonetized an account known as “Disclose.tv,” which has nearly 2 million followers, for posting a video captured by Spaceflight Now photographer Adam Bernstein of Blue Origin’s rocket crash and removing his watermark.

 Disclose.tv, which regularly posts news clips featuring its own watermark, says on its website it is a Germany-based “aggregator of breaking news” that uses “videos from popular sources,” though it has been described by Politifact as a “fake news” outlet. Bier said in a post on X last week the platform has identified “large accounts that have been programmatically reuploading content from smaller accounts to game the revenue share program,” saying impressions earned by these posts will be redirected to the original creators. X.

Earlier this week, 

Bier, in a  rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" style="background: none rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); border: none; box-sizing: border-box; color: #003891; cursor: pointer; outline: none; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank" title="https://x.com/nikitabier/status/2043045929750794399">post

 last month, said X reduced payouts for creators that just aggregate other posts to 60%, vowing to reduce payments by an additional 20% for the following pay cycle.

WHAT OTHER ACCOUNTS HAS X DEMONETIZED?

Earlier this week, Bier said he demonetized an account called “@Rainmaker1973,” which has more than 4 million followers, for reposting thousands of videos lifted from smaller accounts and removing their watermarks over the past six months. “You cannot get more shameless than this. This is your last day in the creator program,” Bier said in a post. The account responded in a post on Friday, calling Bier’s accusations a “lie” and saying small accounts have asked him to repost their videos for visibility. Dom Lucre, an X user whose real name is Dominick McGee, complained on X last month he was demonetized by the platform. Bier, in response, said in a post he was demonetized for reposting AI-generated war videos. As McGee continued to post about his demonetization, Bier said his “crash out has been incredible content.” McGee, who often posts misinformation and conspiracy theories, has more than 1.7 million followers and previously earned about $55,000 a year from X, the New York Times reported last year.

HOW DOES X’S MONETIZATION WORK?

X allows creators who subscribe to its premium membership program to monetize posts, provided they abide by the platform’s content monetization standards, have more than 2,000 followers and have earned more than 5 million impressions across all posts within the preceding 3 months. According to X’s monetization guidelines, posts that promote deceptive or illegal activity, like drugs or weapons, are prohibited from monetization, as are posts considered “engagement bait” or “recycled or unoriginal content.” Other posts that may have monetization restricted include posts about sexual content, violence, strong language or hate speech. In March, in response to a proliferation of AI-generated content about the Iran war, X implemented a new standard prohibiting monetization of AI-generated posts depicting an armed conflict, threatening to suspend creators from the revenue sharing program.

X’s monetization program has previously drawn criticism from users, who have said the financial incentive to post has led to the platform being flooded with “slop,” or low-quality content. Shortly after X introduced its creator revenue sharing program, Mashable reported users had already begun complaining their timelines were flooded with “engagement bait,” saying the platform “rewards those who post rage bait”—or, content designed to foster engagement that “turns anger into dollars as users can't stop themselves from watching or commenting.” A BBC investigation previously found some users earned thousands of dollars from X for posting “misinformation, AI-generated images and unfounded conspiracy theories.”

This is culled from forbes